Expert Work
Corporate Attorney (BigLaw Firms)
Status: Open
- Pay
- $140–$400/hr
- Location
- Remote
- Employment type
- Contractor
- Openings
- 100
- Posted
- 2026-08-21
About this opportunity
Role Title: Corporate Attorney (BigLaw Firms)
Role Type: Contractor
Location: Remote
micro1 is engaging Corporate Attorneys from top BigLaw firms to participate in a unique project for a leading customer. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters. This opportunity is ideal for legal professionals well-versed in high-stakes corporate matters and interested in contributing to the future of legal technology.
Scope of Work
- Review and analyze complex corporate documents, contracts, and deal structures relating to mergers & acquisitions, private equity, and capital markets.
- Provide accurate, detailed input on nuanced legal scenario assessments to inform AI model training.
- Evaluate commercial litigation materials, identifying critical legal principles and procedural details.
- Deliver expert feedback on legal reasoning, issue spotting, and drafting approaches as part of project deliverables.
- Support the creation and refinement of legal data sets by annotating, categorizing, and explaining key issues in corporate law.
- Ensure all work meets high standards for accuracy, clarity, and compliance with US legal practice.
- Collaborate asynchronously with project managers and internal reviewers to align on rubrics and quality expectations.
Preferred Qualifications
- Active license to practice law in the United States.
- Recent experience (current or within the last 3 years) at a top-tier BigLaw firm, focusing on corporate law, mergers & acquisitions, private equity, or capital markets.
- Demonstrated expertise in commercial litigation and high-value transactional matters.
- Exceptional attention to detail in the analysis and interpretation of legal documents.
- Experience drafting, reviewing, and negotiating complex agreements and legal instruments.
- Strong written communication skills, with the ability to clearly and concisely explain legal concepts for diverse audiences.
- Prior experience with legal data annotation or rubric-based review is a plus, but not required.
Required skills
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Corporate law
- Commerical Litigation
- attention to detail
- private equity
- capital markets
What you'll do
- Review and analyze complex corporate documents, contracts, and deal structures relating to mergers & acquisitions, private equity, and capital markets.
- Provide accurate, detailed input on nuanced legal scenario assessments to inform AI model training.
- Evaluate commercial litigation materials, identifying critical legal principles and procedural details.
- Deliver expert feedback on legal reasoning, issue spotting, and drafting approaches as part of project deliverables.
- Support the creation and refinement of legal data sets by annotating, categorizing, and explaining key issues in corporate law.
- Ensure all work meets high standards for accuracy, clarity, and compliance with US legal practice.
- Collaborate asynchronously with project managers and internal reviewers to align on rubrics and quality expectations.
Preferred qualifications
- Active license to practice law in the United States.
- Recent experience (current or within the last 3 years) at a top-tier BigLaw firm, focusing on corporate law, mergers & acquisitions, private equity, or capital markets.
- Demonstrated expertise in commercial litigation and high-value transactional matters.
- Exceptional attention to detail in the analysis and interpretation of legal documents.
- Experience drafting, reviewing, and negotiating complex agreements and legal instruments.
- Strong written communication skills, with the ability to clearly and concisely explain legal concepts for diverse audiences.
- Prior experience with legal data annotation or rubric-based review is a plus, but not required.