Expert Work
Legal Case Study Author (AI Training)
Status: Open
- Pay
- $500/task
- Location
- Remote — (European Union)
- Employment type
- Contract
- Posted
- 2026-08-27
About this opportunity
Author regulatory and compliance decision cases grounded in EU law (GDPR, EU AI Act, DORA, MiCA) that train and evaluate frontier AI models. $500 per approved case. Remote.
Required skills
- EU regulatory compliance
- GDPR
- EU AI Act
- DORA
- MiCA
- Legal drafting
- Risk assessment
- Executive-level written analysis
What you'll do
- Author a complete case built around a real decision at a real company, from scoping through submission.
- Write the case study brief: a firm-and-role persona (never your own name), the audience and the decision in front of it, and a real company (listed EU with public data, or private with disclosed financials) with a one-line justification of why it supports a verifiable decision.
- Build the thesis as 3 to 5 bullets, each carrying a number, plus a preliminary recommendation with a number, flagged as contingent on the analysis.
- Set out the scoped deliverable plan and the assumptions approach: sources named tier by tier, every assumption labeled sourced or estimated, and a pinned as-of date for the data.
- State the weakest point of your own case, and its mitigant.
- Assemble a slim data room: 10 to 20 distinct, relevant documents behind a single index. Prefer real public documents. Where an internal figure is genuinely undisclosed, construct a clearly labeled case-data extract anchored to a cited public benchmark.
- Make every number in the case trace to a data-room document.
- Anchor each case on a live compliance decision with resources and consequences attached: whether a product launch is compliant and under what conditions, the risk classification of an AI system under the EU AI Act and the obligations that follow, a DORA ICT third-party remediation decision, whether a token or service falls in scope of MiCA and the licensing consequence, or a cross-border data-transfer decision after a regulator ruling. Purely academic or overview-of-the-law topics are rejected.
- Cite real regulations at article level (for example Art. 6(1) and Annex III EU AI Act, or Art. 28 GDPR) and real regulator materials: EDPB guidelines, ESMA and EBA statements, published enforcement decisions.
- Include an in-scope justification line in the brief: why this company and this decision sit inside the named regulatory framework.
- Draw the data room on regulation excerpts, regulator guidance and enforcement decisions, company disclosures and policies, and clearly labeled internal-style extracts where needed.
Requirements
- Law degree (LLB, LLM, JD or equivalent) or compliance-focused degree with legal-regulatory work experience
- Minimum 2 years of non-academic legal, regulatory, compliance or data-protection experience
- Working command of at least two of GDPR, EU AI Act, DORA, MiCA, NIS2, MiFID II
- Able to cite regulation at article level
- Professional English
- Human-authored work only, with no AI use anywhere in the case (file metadata is verified)
- Available for a short live walkthrough call during assessment
- Remote, working to your own schedule against an agreed submission date
Preferred qualifications
- In-house experience as, or alongside, a General Counsel, DPO, or Head of Compliance.
- Hands-on work with published enforcement decisions or regulator correspondence.
- Advisory experience on AI systems, ICT third-party risk, or crypto-asset licensing.
- Prior work authoring teaching cases, training material, or AI evaluation data.